On 2/17/2012 10:27 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
Thanks..

We're also ok with going to an 11.x release if there's a such thing as a
"golden release" in the 11.x code...;)



I had to jump to 11.2 for static units with auto-configure on the same interface on an MX80 for subscriber services. Running into a slew of problems, although it is at least operational and doing what it needs to do. 11.x makes me cringe, but unfortunately I require features. I'm running a 4 problem ticket right now on it, from slow dns resolver to delays on show interface displaying the logical units, to race conditions causing issues between auto-configure and configuring static units (they didn't have the static units override existing auto-configured units that shared the same vlan), to sampled eating filedescriptors until the box runs out if it is configured even if not applied to an interface.

My mx80s and mx960s running 10.4R7.5 have been stable so far, although I did notice some weirdness sometimes withe the ae setups (when the AE was first brought up, isis came up, arp worked, but ping/bgp did not; disable/enable fixed it and it has stayed stable so far, but I don't trust it).

Jack
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to