I am heavily using them, and they are reliable for me mehmet
On Mar 5, 2012, at 3:28 PM, TCIS List Acct wrote: > Over the past few years the general feeling I've gotten reading j-nsp and > elsewhere was to stay away from the SRX line until the code matured. We've > got > an upcoming project that I'm considering using a SRX 240 for. > > Has the code matured to the point that it can be considered a stable platform > for security (just basic firewall, 1:1 NATs, maybe a few VPNs), high > availability, and some very basic layer 3 routing services? > > TIA. > > --Mike > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
