Hi Keegan,
Thanks for your reply and explaining all the caveats of mpls signaling 
protocols. First of all, I am not gonna use this kind of setup in real 
environment. I am doing all of this in order to learn how to integrate two 
different labeling protocols in various circumstances. 
I don't wana run same signaling protocol on the PEs, so PE1 will run LDP and 
PE2 will run RSVP. Since PE2 is not gonna run LDP at all,  so I can't use 
ldp-tunneling here either. I could have use bgp labeled on top of ldp and rsvp 
but was wondering if there are any other workarounds. 
Second, will it work for 6pe if you use bpg labeled mpls signaled path as an 
next-hop for 6pe.
ThanksAndrew 

From: keegan.hol...@sungard.com
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:56:53 -0400
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] redistributing label between rsvp and ldp
To: go...@live.com
CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Labels aren't like routes per se.  They only point to a next hop and not a 
destination so you don't have to exchange labels between two routing protocols 
in the same way you would routes.  You only have to configure the routers at 
the edge of each topology so that it runs both protocols.  That being said RSVP 
adds a caveat.  If you try to form a RSVP LSP that traverses a router that 
isn't running RSVP it will either fail to form or re-route.  



LDP does not have this constraint and just advertises labels to directly 
connected peers.  To bridge between the two protocols I would configure p3 (and 
every router at the edge of your RSVP domain) as a PE running both LDP and 
RSVP.  You can terminate the RSVP LSP's there.  Since it's a PE it should be 
able to match the L3VPN information advertised by pe2 via BGP with the LDP 
labels it's advertising.  



You could also turn on LDP on all of your routers.  Any IP that doesn't have an 
RSVP next hop failover to LDP and vise versa.  This is easier to manage since 
it will be obvious which paths use LDP and which ones use RSVP.  The ultimate 
solution is probably to run only one label protocol though.





2012/4/29 Uzi Be <go...@live.com>




hi,

I was just testing out to swap labels between two different signaling protocols 
(ldp and rsvp). lets say we have two different network, one is running ldp and 
the other one is running rsvp (same AS, so no inter-as options).



ce - pe1 - p1 - p2 - p3 -p4 -pe2 - ce

so pe1 - p1 - p2 -p3 are running rsvp and p4-pe2 are running ldp, and edge ce's 
are using l3vpn. what are the options to have a labeled path from pe2 to pe1 
(considering that pe1 is not going to run ldp protocol, and pe2 can't use rsvp 
so ldp tunneling is not an option here).



thanks in advance for your comments.

Andrew

_______________________________________________

juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp




                                          
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to