Gotta love those proteus guys. Doing a write up on this so I don't have to :)
http://www.proteus.net/sites/default/files/how_to_disable_idp_in_an_srx_0.pdf I'm pretty sure you need to either kill the process or bounce the box for it to "officially" take effect as the memory is allocated/consumed upon start up. Hope this helps, -Tim Eberhard On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 7:51 AM, David Klein <davidkl...@dhk.com> wrote: > How do you disable IDP and UTM? > > Thanks... > > -David Klein > > -----Original Message----- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Eberhard > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 9:13 PM > To: Maciej Jan Broniarz > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] problems with srx240 > > If I recall correctly, I looked into this previously and found that this was > due to idp being enabled (which it is by default) but not being used by > policy. I want to say the fix to stop these non-impacting albeit annoying > log messages is to just disable IDP all together. > > Hope that helps, > -Tim Eberhard > > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz <gau...@gausus.net> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> My SRX240 box started showing the following error in the logs: >> >> May 5 00:36:08 srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 00: sp = 0x49202a58, pc = >> 0x08020254 May 5 00:36:08 srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 01: sp = >> 0x49202b00, pc = 0x0800c1fc May 5 00:36:08 srx240-lab srx240-lab >> Frame 02: sp = 0x49202b70, pc = 0x0800d300 May 5 00:36:08 srx240-lab >> srx240-lab Frame 03: sp = 0x49202b90, pc = 0x082cb550 May 5 00:36:08 >> srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 04: sp = 0x49202be8, pc = 0x080198c0 May >> 5 00:36:08 srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 05: sp = 0x49202c10, pc = >> 0x080198c0 May 5 00:36:08 srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 06: sp = >> 0x49202c38, pc = 0x080198c0 May 5 00:36:08 srx240-lab srx240-lab >> Frame 07: sp = 0x49202c60, pc = 0x08019a2c May 5 00:36:08 srx240-lab >> srx240-lab Frame 08: sp = 0x49202c98, pc = 0x0801fc34 May 5 00:36:08 >> srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 09: sp = 0x49202cc0, pc = 0x09dc54c8 May >> 5 00:36:18 srx240-lab srx240-lab SCHED: Thread 14 (Forwarding Thread) >> ran for 1572 ms without yielding May 5 00:36:18 srx240-lab >> srx240-lab Scheduler Oinker May 5 00:36:18 srx240-lab srx240-lab >> Frame 00: sp = 0x491b8c68, pc = 0x08020254 May 5 00:36:18 srx240-lab >> srx240-lab Frame 01: sp = 0x491b8d10, pc = 0x0800c1fc May 5 00:36:18 >> srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 02: sp = 0x491b8d80, pc = 0x088b3c8c May >> 5 00:36:18 srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 03: sp = 0x491b8dd0, pc = >> 0x088b76d0 May 5 00:36:18 srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 04: sp = >> 0x491b8e50, pc = 0x0801fc34 May 5 00:36:18 srx240-lab srx240-lab >> Frame 05: sp = 0x491b8e78, pc = 0x09dc54c8 >> >> The box isn't heavy loaded - just about 1-2megs of trafiic per sec. >> >> What might be the problem here? >> >> All best, >> mjb >> >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp