Did you try gracefully restarting routing? That should keep it forwarding while freeing route process memory
Will O'Brien On Nov 30, 2012, at 2:57 PM, "Giuliano Medalha" <[email protected]> wrote: > People, > > We are doing some BGP tests using routing-instances on MX5-T-DC routers. > > We have created a routing-instance to receive 3 full routing inet.0 tables. > > The master routing has 3 majors full routing tables too. > > Before the tests we check the RE percentage of using memory ... using: > > Router> show chassis routing engine > > It show 47% usage. > > After the creation of the routing-instance (type virtual-router) - named > TEST we could receive more 3 full routing tables on the TEST.inet.0 table > > Using the same command is show to us: > > Router> show chassis routing engine > > 87% memory utilization > > After we remove the routing-instance configuration with a commit command in > sequence ... it still shows the same 87% of memory utilization > > It this procedure is correct ? Is it any update command to clear the > memory allocation without disrupting forwarding services ? > > Can you please give me some feedback about it ? > > Did anyone see it before ? > > Thanks a lot, > > Giuliano > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
