All, Just to clarify a few things, The destination is not in inet.3. I do not have a direct LSP to the destination and cannot create one (The destination doesn't support MPLS nor does it support BGP)
The show route output is: jashton@cr01-re0> show route xx.xxx.xx.x/24 inet.0: 448173 destinations, 3298320 routes (445123 active, 39 holddown, 465440 hidden) @ = Routing Use Only, # = Forwarding Use Only + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both xx.xxx.xx.x/24 *[OSPF/150] 1d 12:35:24, metric 20, tag 0 > to xx.xxx.xx.x via xe-4/2/0.0 [BGP/170] 01:03:59, localpref 100, from xx.xxx.xx.x AS path: I > to xx.xxx.xx.x via xe-5/2/0.0 [BGP/170] 6d 19:17:07, MED 20, localpref 100, from xx.xxx.xx.x AS path: I > to xx.xxx.xx.x via ae3.0 [BGP/170] 6d 18:57:09, MED 20, localpref 100, from xx.xxx.xx.x AS path: I > to xx.xxx.xx.x via ae2.0 [BGP/170] 6d 19:03:11, MED 20, localpref 100, from xx.xxx.xx.x AS path: I > to xx.xxx.xx.x via ae2.0 [BGP/170] 6d 19:02:45, MED 20, localpref 100, from xx.xxx.xx.x AS path: I > to xx.xxx.xx.x via ae2.0 [BGP/170] 6d 19:18:02, MED 20, localpref 100, from xx.xxx.xx.x AS path: I > to xx.xxx.xx.x via xe-4/2/0.0 [BGP/170] 6d 17:40:10, MED 20, localpref 100, from xx.xxx.xx.x AS path: I > to xx.xxx.xx.x via xe-5/2/0.0 [BGP/170] 2d 13:54:44, MED 20, localpref 100, from xx.xxx.xx.x AS path: I > to xx.xxx.xx.x via ae6.0 [BGP/170] 6d 19:20:12, MED 20, localpref 100, from xx.xxx.xx.x AS path: I > to xx.xxx.xx.x via xe-4/2/0.0 [BGP/170] 6d 17:31:28, MED 20, localpref 100, from xx.xxx.xx.x AS path: I > to xx.xxx.xx.x via xe-5/2/0.0 [BGP/170] 6d 17:40:12, MED 20, localpref 100, from xx.xxx.xx.x AS path: I > to xx.xxx.xx.x via xe-5/2/0.0 inet.3: 1232 destinations, 1248 routes (9 active, 0 holddown, 1232 hidden) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Colby Barth" <cba...@juniper.net> To: "James Ashton" <ja...@gitflorida.com> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:31:51 AM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Traffic balancing over LSPs James- Could you possibly send the output of 'show route x.x.x.x/y' for one of the destinations that you think should resolve over the LSP? I suspect that this destinations are not in inet3 for some reason. -Colby On Jan 18, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Phil Bedard wrote: > Is it all one OSPF area or is the CMTS in an area other than 0? If the > MX480 is an ABR you can restrict the OSPF routes and originate them on > the MX480 as BGP instead using aggregate statements. > > Phil From: James Ashton > Sent: 1/17/2013 11:07 > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] Traffic balancing over LSPs > I have an interesting situation that has me stumped for the moment. > > I have an OSPF speaking device (ARRIS CMTS) hanging off from an EX Switch. > That switch is uplinked to an MX480 which is part of the network core. > It has several paths into it from rest of the network. > From several major traffic centers in the network I have 3 LSPs > created to the MX480. > I am running "mpls traffic-engineering mpls-forwarding" throughout the > network. > > As the end users hanging off the CMTS are advertised onto the network > via OSPF, and I cannot terminate LSPs on the CMTS, the traffic to > these users is not being forwarded over the LSPs. > I have tested enabling "ospf traffic-engineering shortcuts" but that > is breaking several paths in the network to legacy areas with odd > configs. > > My question is basically, how can I get this traffic into these LSPs > in way that is more manageable at scale than a pile of static routes. > > > I hope the above is clear, I am low on Caffeine at the moment. > > Thank you in advance for any help/ideas. > > James > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp