Marcus - I am building about 10 PoPs and opted for the dual mx-80 design. Also looked at making the PoPs all layer 2 with a pair of exs.
Plan to use MC-LAG where applicable. On Jan 21, 2013, at 3:43 PM, "Markus H" <hauschild.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder what kind of redundancy the community would prefer for > small-medium sized PoPs. > This is what I have come up with so far: > > a) 2xMX80 > Pro: Two seperate devices so less prone to config errors and chassis failure > Con: Using redundant uplinks is more complicated (LB would need to be > done via routing protocol) > > b) 1xMX240/480 with redundant SCB and RE > Pro: Easier to use redundant uplinks (LACP) > Con: Config error as well as chassis failure brings the whole PoP down > > Any further arguments? Best practices? What did you deploy? > > > Best regards, > Markus > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp