Hehe, sorry bud. I missed this when I had a quick look at the release notes myself.
On 31 January 2013 14:45, Eric Van Tol <e...@atlantech.net> wrote: > Your post almost gave me a heart attack, as we just purchased two of these > specifically for UAC. Our Juniper reps were about to get an earful from > me. :-)**** > > ** ** > > -evt**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Mark Menzies [mailto:m...@deimark.net] > *Sent:* Thursday, January 31, 2013 9:09 AM > *To:* Eric Van Tol > > *Cc:* juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > *Subject:* Re: [j-nsp] MAG2600 versus 4610 and above**** > > ** ** > > Ahh, nice one. I didnt realise that the 2600 was "upgraded" :)**** > > This is the kind of thing that Juniper need to be making more noise about > as some of our customers would definitely like this. :)**** > > ** ** > > On 31 January 2013 13:06, Eric Van Tol <e...@atlantech.net> wrote:**** > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- > > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Menzies > > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 7:14 AM > > To: David Gee > > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MAG2600 versus 4610 and above > >**** > > > MAG2600 is only SSL or Enterprise guest access. It doesn't do UAC. > > > > Its only from the MAG4600 and up do we see the full blown UAC > > personality > > switching there. > >**** > > The MAG2600 does support UAC: > > > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/ive/releasenotes/j-sa-sslvpn-7.2R1-whatsnew.pdf > > -evt**** > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp**** > > ** ** > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp