You are going to have to provide more information that describes the
problem you are seeing. Output showing the problem would be helpful.

-Jon


On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Farhat Abbasse
<ab_ferha...@hotmail.co.uk>wrote:

>
>
>
> HI Community,
>
>
> I wonder if anyone has already tried to configure RR for labeled Unicast
> family ?
> I have configured the BGP RR for both families inet-vpn and
>  labeled-unicast on the same router, the RR for the inet-vpn worked
> perfectly, however for Labeled Unicast family it did not work.
>
> Below are the topology and the Configurations that I have done:
>
>
>
>
>            -------
>            | RR  |
>          //-------\\
>         //           \\
>    -------          --------
>    | R1  |         | R2   |
>    -------          --------
>
>
>
> RR Router:
>
> group LU_M-iBGP {
>     type internal;
>     local-address 10.200.240.1;
>     family inet {
>         labeled-unicast
>     }
>
>     family inet-vpn {
>         unicast;
>     }
>     export Export-Loopback;
>     cluster 10.200.240.1;
>     neighbor 10.200.240.2;
>     neighbor 10.200.240.11;
> }
>
> policy-options policy-statement Export-Loopback
> term Loopback {
>     from interface lo0.0;
>     then accept;
> }
>
>
>
> R1:
> admin@R1# show protocols bgp
> group LU_M-iBGP {
>     type internal;
>     local-address 10.200.240.2;
>     family inet {
>         labeled-unicast
>     }
>
>     family inet-vpn {
>         unicast;
>     }
>
>     export Export-Loopback;
>     neighbor 10.200.240.1;
>
> }
>
> admin@R1# show policy-options policy-statement Export-Loopback
> term Loopback {
>     from interface lo0.0;
>     then accept;
> }
>
>
> R2:
>
> admin@R2# show protocols bgp
> group LU_M-iBGP {
>     type internal;
>     local-address 10.200.240.11;
>     family inet {
>         labeled-unicast
>     }
>
>     family inet-vpn {
>         unicast;
>     }
>
>     export Export-Loopback;
>     neighbor 10.200.240.1;
>
> }
>
> admin@R2# show policy-options policy-statement Export-Loopback
> term Loopback {
>     from interface lo0.0;
>     then accept;
> }
>
>
> I do not know if Labeled unicast family do support Route-Reflector ?
>
> Thanks in advance for your Support.
>
> BR/
> Farhat
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to