I'm making VC's out of all our existing 3300 top of rack switches, as well as the EX8200 core, resulting in no spanning tree bs, 40gbit lags + lacp to the tor vc and SRX cluster, plus 2-4gbit lags to the server using lacp bonding mode.
It works great as long as layer 4 hashing is configured server side to allow for more than 1gbit between two hosts. Bonding isn't extremely robust by itself. Morgan On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Mike Devlin <juni...@meeksnet.ca> wrote: > what device(s)? > > reth interfaces on SRX's or AE interfaces on EX's sounds like what you are > looking for. > > virtual chassis between a couple EX switches, and LACP on the ae interface > which has its physical interfaces across 2 physically separated switches > connected to a server that is using LACP as well should work. I know > people have done it, i just cant personally speak from experience > > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Morgan McLean <wrx...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think Mark is referring to bonding under linux...right? Typically >> bonding >> has an active / passive pair, and it can also round robin sending the >> packets out individual interfaces. Obviously all returning traffic will be >> destined to one mac, which is the active slave at the time. >> >> Bonding also supports LACP though. >> >> Morgan >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dale Shaw <dale.shaw+j-...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Mark, >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Mark Jones <mjo...@mnsi.net> wrote: >> > > Is it possible to have the same ip accessible via two interfaces the >> same >> > > way you would on a server. This is on an mx series router. >> > >> > What do you mean when you say "..the same way you would on a server" ? >> > >> > Assigning the same IP address to separate interfaces (logical or >> > physical) is usually "wrong", unless each interface is in a separate >> > routing instance/VRF. >> > >> > Can you describe your scenario? >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Dale >> > _______________________________________________ >> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Morgan >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > > -- Thanks, Morgan _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp