I had a couple over here, they seemed pretty good. I had L3VPN working and l2circuit but didn't try VPLS and I was not aware of the limitation.
Now, I am a little surprised about this lack of feature parity. It is supposed to be a Trio box, so shouldn't everything work? All in all though the ACXs we tried were really good and we will be using them. It's better than all the SRX boxes I have out at the moment! (though they have worked really very well) -- Leigh > > Only l2circuit for now, rumors are that vpls is in the roadmap. > > With vpls it could get really interesting... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Caillin > Bathern > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 2:39 PM > To: Ben Dale; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] LDP on ex4200/3200 series..and 1RU LSR? > > No multicast today either... just a head ups :( L3VPNs also missing > until the end of the month.. > > -----Original Message----- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ben Dale > Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012 11:25 PM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net List > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] LDP on ex4200/3200 series....and 1RU LSR? > > > > On 20/12/2012, at 4:58 PM, Michel de Nostredame <d.nos...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Possibly Juniper is positioning ACX for that? > > But ACX has far lower port density and those 1U ACX has only DC > > power-supplier. > > This was my feeling too, but there is *currently* no VPLS support on > ACX. I'm hoping that will change in the future. > > The passive cooling is a big win and although the data sheet doesn't > mention it, there is an AC version of the ACX 1100 on the pricelist: > > ACX1100 Universal Access Router, AC Version, Dual power supply, 1RU, > ETSI 300, SyncE/1588v2, Temperature hardened, Passively cooled,8xGE > RJ45, 4xGE RJ45/SFP Combo (Optics Sold Separately) > > I've got a pair of these coming into the lab in the new year (lead > times are currently measured in *months*) and will be interested to see > what the limitations are. They're priced right in the middle of the > J4350 and J6350 too which is also interesting. > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Mark Tees <markt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Can't help but wonder what they were thinking with that design. > >> > >> How many people out there want this functionality in a 1RU box? > >> > >> On 20/12/2012, at 1:00 PM, Tim Jackson wrote: > >> > >>> It can't even pass packets with > 1 label. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Tim > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Mark Tees <markt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> Would it be feasible still for only outer label operations? > >>> > >>> To use as P router would you only ever need to work with outer > label? > >>> > >>> Sent from some sort of iDevice. > >>> > >>> On 20/12/2012, at 9:52 AM, Craig Askings > <caski...@ionetworks.com.au> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 19 December 2012 20:18, Mark Tees <markt...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi list. > >>>>> > >>>>> Has anyone heard about if there is ever going to be support for > >>>>> LDP on the > >>>>> ex4200/3200 series? > >>>> > >>>> From what I understand the chipset on ex4200/3200 does not support > >>>> more than one mpls label, so LDP etc is not possible on that > hardware. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> Craig Askings > >>>> > >>>> io Networks Pty Ltd. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> mobile: 0404 019365 > >>>> > >>>> phone: 1300 1 2 4 8 16 > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > -- > Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and > content filtering.http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud > service. > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com > ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp