On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 04:34:18 PM Pavel Lunin wrote: > I just wanted to note, that from the money point of view > at the time when MX80 was under construction, it /could/ > be a wise decision to not compete against products like > CES/CER and make it more router-alike than a MetroE > optimized device.
In fairness, the Cisco ME3600X/3800X is really a router. A lot of issues in the beginning mostly based on lack of features due to the software being fresh, but that has mostly been addressed, and only kinky stuff and bug fixes is what's coming in now. I doubt you will find any other switch from Cisco that is claimed as a Metro-E access platform that does the all QoS you'll find on software-based IOS platforms. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
