Slow control-plane. No RE redundancy. More limited rib & fib than
regular MX. Cryptic licensing scheme.
Otherwise nothing really wrong.
Christian
Le 02/07/2013 15:55, Drew Weaver a écrit :
And what is wrong with the MX80 as a peering/transit router for up to 80Gbps of
traffic?
Thanks,
-Drew
-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Dobbins, Roland
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 9:01 AM
To: juniper-nsp Puck
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Advice on a 100Gbps+ environment
On Jul 2, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
Says who?
Doh - MX*480*, not MX*80*. My mistake.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
-- John Milton
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
