If I understand this correctly we are doing similar today... Today, we have several POP's which have switches with VLAN trunks to various equipment providing PPPOE (fixed wireless, xDSL etc). At those switches, we send a trunk up to an MX router. Each of those VLAN's coming into the MX is transported as either VPLS or L2VPN back to a centralized BNG (MX as well).
xDSL--->VLAN Tags--->Switch--->VLAN Tags---->MX---->L2VPN---->MPLS Network---->BNG(MX) We treat the VLAN's just like any other L2VPN traffic... Is this what you are thinking of doing? Thanks, Paul On 2013-09-17 8:39 AM, "William Jackson" <william.jack...@gibtele.com> wrote: >Gents > >Theoretical question here: > >I currently have a setup where I transport PPPoE frames between my xDSL >boxes and a centralised BNG. >I use one vlan tag per xDSL box aggregator box, so all the subs from a >specific box have the same vlan tag. > >xDSL---->(vlan tagged Eth)-->PE-->MPLS Network-->PE-->(vlan tagged >Eth)-->BNG(PPPoE) Termination. > >This means that the mpls service I use to send my PPPoE traffic to my >centralised BNG ends on the BNGs upstream PE node, and I use a standard >vlan-tagging interface between BNG and PE. >I would like to extend the VPLS service to the BNG ( MX platform ), is it >possible to interwork the PPPoE termination into the VPLS service? > >I cant seem to find anything about a type of setup like this? > >Thank you > >_______________________________________________ >juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp