why not using qfx5100 platform ? much better low latency 0,6 us and new hardware from juniper
Sent from my iPhone > On 15/03/2014, at 13:02, "Paul S." <cont...@winterei.se> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I've got a client who's interested in deploying the 3500 as TORs. > > He'll need to evenly distribute around 20/30g of bandwidth (via aggregated > ethernet links) to multitudes of virtualized systems with individual vlans > all located in singular racks. > > Would the QFX be an okay solution in this scenario? There's an heavy > preference towards Juniper gear due to most of the connected networks being > run on Juniper gear as well. > > And if not, what would the community suggest? > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
