So that’s what the book says but the sample rate does seem to have an effect. I found some previous threads on this list while googling and they indicate that when changing the sample rate the multipliers change on the collector but there’s some question about the 1:1 as the only supported rate. I’m mainly just wanting to make sure if I set 1:1 I won’t blow up the boxes.:)
I’m getting more confused the more I google so hopefully we can get some definitive answer. On Jun 11, 2014, at 11:40 AM, Eric Van Tol <e...@atlantech.net> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf >> Of Scott Granados >> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 11:13 AM >> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> Subject: [j-nsp] Question about inline flow sampling on MX 480 / Treo >> based interfaces >> >> What's the story on this and are there any >> pointers to methods of determining the best most granular rate possible? >> Any help would be most appreciated. >> > > It's my understanding that the sample rate has no effect when inline sampling > is being done. It can be configured, but sampling is performed on a 1:1 > ratio no matter what. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. > > -evt > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
