Yes, this is the point why it doesn't work. Tks
Sent with Mobile -------- Messaggio originale -------- Da: Edward Dore <edward.d...@freethought-internet.co.uk> Data: A: dim0sal <dim0...@hotmail.com> Cc: sth...@nethelp.no,juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Oggetto: Re: [j-nsp] QinQ interface configuration question How does the device know which unit on the physical interface an ingress packet belongs to though when you’re defining the same VLAN tags on each unit? Edward Dore Freethought Internet On 20 Jul 2014, at 19:47, dim0sal <dim0...@hotmail.com> wrote: Didn't catch your point. Inside routing-instances configuration you have to declare which interfaces belongs to... right? Sent with Mobile -------- Messaggio originale -------- Da: sth...@nethelp.no Data: A: dim0...@hotmail.com Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Oggetto: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [j-nsp] QinQ interface configuration question What about scenario 4) in this way: interface ge-0/0/0.1 vlan-tags outer a inner a and interface ge-0/0/0.2 vlan-tags outer a inner a This is what we re talking about. This doesn't work despite of the different routing-instances, right? Obviously doesn't work. And I'm afraid I don't understand what you are trying to achieve here. With different routing-instances, *what exactly* is supposed to determine which routing-instance a packet belongs to? Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
