On Monday, December 01, 2014 03:09:15 PM Eric Van Tol wrote: > I'm pretty sure the VRR is mostly for solving the problem > of iBGP session scaling. If that's not the case, I'm > sure someone will correct me.
I think vMX can forward data. It will come down to how well it optimizes the CPU, and how good the CPU actually is. > You don't have much choice with eBGP if you don't want to > use multihop, unless you want to backhaul every customer > circuit via L2 to your VRR, in which case the VRR is > basically the gateway for the customer's circuit. Agree. Your design can get complicated if you separate routing from forwarding for a particular device or downstream-set. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp