QFX5100 has L2VPN (LDP based) now, and will get EVPN support.. On Dec 24, 2014 7:07 AM, "Chuck Anderson" <c...@wpi.edu> wrote:
> EX9200 has more potential to support more MPLS features as a PE, like > EVPN. QFX5100 is a nice box, but won't do much MPLS (L3VPN, but no > L2VPN, VPLS or EVPN). See the Feature Explorer: > > http://pathfinder.juniper.net/feature-explorer/search-features.html > > Interestingly, EX9200 isn't shown as having L3VPN support. You need > to take the Feature Explorer with a grain of salt. If you look up > "BGP for L2VPNs and L3VPNs" for example, it only shows PTX support for > that feature, but of course MX supports that too. > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 03:55:30AM +0000, Randy Manning wrote: > > People, > > > > Any advice on a distribution layer switch for campus networks? juniper > > qfx5100 vs ex9200? I am not sure what the requirements need to be a > > priority. The core is MX 960 and currently routing. I am thinking about > > campus distro¹s becoming PE with TE and allowing the core¹s to label > > switch only? Given the current network and possible change, which > > platform is the best? Qfx or ex? > > > > Data centers are working well with q-fabric, but I understand that has > > been abandoned by juniperŠ. Which is sadŠ I liked the eVPN BGP NLRI > design. > > > > > > Thanks, > > ----- > > Randy > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp