Is the route in the isis database ? If yes, can you please post the output of the isis db ?
Is this a multilevel network ? If yes, did you check the up/down bits ? On Friday, 6 February 2015, Dragan Jovicic <dragan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello. > > We have two routers in ISP network exporting identical static routes to > IS-IS; all routers install static route to closest of the two routers. > Those two routes do not install route received over IS-IS as inactive into > inet.0 table. > > Only when one of the two routers deletes its static route, is route from > IS-IS installed into IS-IS RIB and in routing table. > > Could anyone shed a light on this - is this expected behavior? Shouldn't > both routers install two routes as inactive into inet.0 table? > > Regards > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net <javascript:;> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > -- ./diogo -montagner JNCIE-SP 0x41A _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp