Thanks.. Exactly the answer that I was looking.. Just needed to know the feature/solution name so I can go research it.
Found this doc: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/solutions/information-products/pathway-pages/solutions/8010092-en.pdf IPoE would be what it is. Another Example: http://rickmur.com/bras-on-juniper-mx/ On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > > > On 6/Mar/15 00:34, Chris Evans wrote: > > I'm a FIOS user and they use Juniper MX in many locations (along with E > > series in older installs) and I'm curious of a typical configuration > they'd > > be using. WIth FIOS I just have a straight ethernet connection, no > logging > > in, no providing user information, etc.. > > > > So since i'm not logging in would that still be a BRAS configuration? > > Also they have a feature enabled that poisons ARP entries if you try to > put > > a box on the wire that has a different IP than what your DHCP lease is > > given you. What feature would that be? > > > > Very curious how they'd do this. I've only worked with JUNOS boxes in the > > enterprise so I don't have experience with features like this. > > Yes, it would still be a BNG solution, but using DHCP (in lieu of PPPoE). > > Authentication could be based on several things such as MAC address, > VLAN ID, switch/OLT port, or a combination of them. > > The MX as a BNG supports DHCP subscriber management. I'm sure the ERX > does too. > > Personally, I prefer DHCP to PPPoE. > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp