Does this affect other MX series boxes as well please? adam > -----Original Message----- > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf > Of Jordan Whited > Sent: 20 March 2015 17:41 > To: Tan Heng Chai > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 BGP Convergence > > observed with inline sampling enabled, 1.5m in RIB, and one v4 feed (~250k > active-paths) changing state > > 11.4R7.5 - 10+ minutes > 12.3R8.7 - ~220 seconds > 14.2R1.9 - ~200 seconds > > YMMV > > > On Mar 20, 2015, at 1:09 PM, Tan Heng Chai <ad...@sg.gs> wrote: > > > > Hi J-NSP, > > > > Just wondering if anyone has benchmark/feedback on BGP > convergence times on the MX80 with and without sampling on versions > higher than 11.4R7.5, especially with reference to PR836197 and the sampling > issue? > > -- > > > > Yours Sincerely, > > > > Tan Heng Chai > > Chief Technical Officer - SG.GS > > http://www.sg.gs > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp