On 11/12/15 17:16, Chuck Anderson wrote:
For those of us who wish to/need to use commercial NMS software, are
there any that support NETCONF? And NETCONF isn't the answer yet
anyway to cross-vendor standardization, at least not until standard
YANG models are developed. At least Q-BRIDGE-MIB exists as a
standard.
On the commercial NMSes, no idea. I would hope that commercial products
would provide a way to integrate external datasources, but maybe not.
I take your point about Netconf versus SNMP, and I don't disagree with
you that Juniper should really fix this - "it's been broken for ages" is
a pretty poor excuse, they could always provide a config knob to toggle
on the new behaviour.
But I just don't see them fixing it.
Re: YANG - at this point I'd take reliable, comprehensive APIs with
*any* reasonably sane, documented data models, standard or otherwise.
We're a long way from being able to rely on standard data models IMO,
which is unfortunate but a reality.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
