But would that be +14 assuming no VLAN headers, +18 assuming 1 VLAN header, +22 assuming q-in-q ?
Was always my understanding that JunOS MTU figures were on-the-wire frame sizes, whereas Cisco was always payload sizes, with requisite headers accounted for automagically. On 19 December 2015 at 16:23, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > > > On 19/Dec/15 05:23, Victor Sudakov wrote: > >> Dear Colleagues, >> >> The MTU on EX4200 ports in port-mode access is 1514 bytes. Shouldn't >> it become 1518 bytes when the port is reconfigured in port-mode trunk ? > > You can set the interface MTU on the EX4200 to whatever you want; up to > 9,192 bytes. > >> >> And if I want to configure the MTU on an EX4200 to match MTU=2000 on a >> Cisco Catalyst, what would be the correct value? 2014? 2018? > > +14 bytes on the Juniper for whatever you have running on IOS and IOS XE. > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp