Hi William For example for the layer3 (max routes supported, etc) why not the one of the QFX5100 acting as routing engine (and spine)?
Is there something stated on the juniper.net site? Cheers James Il 23/Gen/2016 00:32, "William Johansson" <william.johansso...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hello > > The scalability levels and features in a mixed mode vcf (for all switches > that are part of the vcf) will be lowered to the levels of the lowest > switch model. This means that the numbers of ae's, mac address table size, > routing tables size, cos features etc for the whole vcf will (in your case) > be same as the ex4300. > > Br William > > > Skickat från min iPad > > 21 jan. 2016 kl. 16:22 skrev james list <jameslis...@gmail.com>: > > > > Hello experts, > > > > a question regarding a mixed VCF environment with QFX5100 as spine and > > QFX5100/EX4300 as leaf. > > > > > > > > My customer question is: what are the Layer2/Layer3 maximum performance > > expected to be reached in a mixed environment ? > > > > > > > > The one reached by QFX5100 or the one reached by EX4300 or something > else ? > > > > > > > > I imagine that if traffic enter on QFX and exit on QFX the performance > are > > the one from QFX, if enter on QFX and exit on EX the performance are the > > one from EX. > > > > > > > > For performance I mean max throughput, max switching capacity, maximum > > supported routes, etc.. > > > > > > > > Am I correct ? > > > > Any reference url or experience ? > > > > > > > > Thank you in advance > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > James > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
