Hello,
What is the current best practice for carrying full tables in MX series routers? I have 3 new MX480s coming soon and will use them to rebuild my core network (currently a mix of MX240 & MX80 routers). MPC-NG (w/ 20x1g & 10x10g MICS )& RE-S-X6-64G-BB. I’m running MPLS now and have full tables in the default route instance. Does it make more sense (i.e. more secure core) to run full tables in a separate virtual-router? I’ve been doing this small ISP thing for 20+ years, Cisco before, Juniper now, I’ve always bashed my way through. Looking for a book, NANOG presentation or guide on what is current best practice with state of the art gear. MPLS? BGP? IS-IS? LDP? etc. The network is a triangle (A -> B -> C -> A), MX480 at each POP, 10g connections between POPs, 10g connections to IX & upstreams. Most customers are fed redundantly from A & B Thanks -Matt _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
