Thanks Daniel, this is encouraging...  I wonder if I can get the specifics on 
when that will be available 

Aaron

-----Original Message-----
From: dverl...@gmail.com [mailto:dverl...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Verlouw
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 3:03 PM
To: Aaron <aar...@gvtc.com>
Cc: juniper-nsp List <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ACX5048 - protect remote access (telnet, ssh, http, snmp)

Hi,

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Aaron <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote:
> agould@eng-lab-acx5048-1# commit confirmed 1 [edit interfaces lo0 unit 
> 0 family inet]
>   'filter'
>     Referenced filter 'local_acl' can not be used as default/physical 
> interface specific with lo0 not supported on ingress loopback 
> interface
> error: configuration check-out failed

ACX does not support lo0 filter presently, which sucks. Good news is that it's 
on the roadmap for sometime this year I believe. No clue why they left it out 
in the first place...
As an alternative, you can apply input filter either to all your L3 interfaces, 
or use a fwd table filter.
E.g. permit trusted src to your infra, deny non-trusted src to your infra, 
permit everything else for transit.

Regards,
  Daniel.

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to