By the way, if you buy new routers, notice that End of Sale for MX5/10/40/80 is to be announced this year (not RoHS2 compliant). They are replaced by MX104 (coming in various license packages to replicate the licensing model of MX5/10/40).
> Le 17 avr. 2016 à 01:46, Amarjeet Singh <techie.logg...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Hello - HW for MX40 & MX80 is same. > No HW upgrade needed to MX40->MX80, it's just software license required > > MX40 allows to use built in 2 x 10G ports out of total 4, > Where MX80 allows to use all 4 x 10G ports. > > I would not recommend refurbished routers. > > Br, Amarjeet > > Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:30:14 -0400 >> From: Satish Patel <satish....@gmail.com> >> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> Subject: [j-nsp] MX80 vs MX40? >> Message-ID: >> <CAPgF-fq5rTRGvn1k-+CdRzihQhn6AqPhy8n= >> f7_pxz6qoh0...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >> >> My requirement is 10G fiber link terminate on router but in future we >> can go with 20G link so should i consider MX80 or MX40 (cost wise >> also) >> >> If we buy MX80 so in base model it comes with 4x10G fiber ports right? >> or do i need to buy them separately after buying MX80 chassis? >> >> Additionally do i need to buy license separately to activate 10G port? >> because in Cisco ASR1000 chassis you need to buy fiber module >> extension, plue Activation license.. Very costly.. >> >> >> I have check some website they are also selling refurbished or used >> which which in good deal should i think about that because buying to >> MX80 for hardware redundancy will almost bankrupt us ;) >> >> what do you suggest? _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp