On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:14:17AM +0200, j...@czmok.de wrote: > Hi, > > i am looking for the following solution: > > - SITE A - VPLS SITE 1 > - SITE B - VPLS SITE 2 > > On Site A i receive on ae0.1111 Traffic which is tagged with VLAN 1111 > On Site B i want to provide a Layer3 Interface which provides > Layer3-Termination of VLAN1111 > Between Site A and Site B i want to use vpls
> on SITE b: > > TEST { > instance-type virtual-switch; > route-distinguisher 1.2.3.5:1111; > vrf-target target:1111:1111; > protocols { > vpls { > site-range 3; > no-tunnel-services; > site B { > site-identifier 1; > } > } > } > bridge-domains { > vlan1111 { > vlan-id 1111; > routing-interface irb.1111; > } > } > } Don't use a virtual-switch, just use a regular vpls instance, and add a routing-interface irb.1111. Addionally use connectivity-type irb so the VPLS instance stays up even with no physical ports in it: TEST { instance-type vpls; route-distinguisher 1.2.3.5:1111; vrf-target target:1111:1111; routing-interface irb.1111; protocols { vpls { site-range 3; no-tunnel-services; site B { site-identifier 1; } connectivity-type irb; } } } _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp