On 8 June 2016 at 17:58, Aaron <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > Would anyone consider putting a ACX5048 in place of a MX104/ASR9k ?
Be sure you're happy with FIB size, with ACL size, ACL features (ipv4+ipv6, at the same time), control-plane protection etc. ACX across the board is pretty good, if you can live with the compromises made. I often find I can't. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
