Interesting...but that wouldn't that break locally connected interfaces that are just IP?
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > On 4 August 2016 at 00:18, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > > So question is 'how do I ensure, next-hop is only valid when it's via > > LSP tunnel', I'm sure there is good canonical answer to it, but I > > don't know it. > > Aah, I think I know. You can define your resolve ribs in JunOS, just > drop inet.0 from there, then you won't be able to forward traffic > without labeled next-hop. > > -- > ++ytti > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
