I was writting about Junos not IOS. W dniu śr., 22.03.2017 o 14:58 Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> napisał(a):
> I mean operationally difference from JunOS to IOS/IOS-XR. In each > case, policy must exist in config, but must not be applied to customer > to achieve what you want. > > So I do not understand your need for Cisco to implement 'test', I do > not understand what is missing, operationally. > > On 22 March 2017 at 15:38, Brijesh Patel <brju.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I believe so many diffrence between IOS and IOS-Xr. I am not 100% sure > what > > ares. Sorry > > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > >> > >> On 22 March 2017 at 14:58, Tomasz Mikołajek <tmikola...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > You can use test policy when policy statment is commiteted. Is in > active > >> > configuration. If is not commited You get error: Policy referencje but > >> > not > >> > defined. > >> > >> Quite. Which is why I'm struggling to understand what is the > >> difference to IOS/IOS-XR? > >> > >> -- > >> ++ytti > > > > > > > > -- > ++ytti > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
