Hi Aaron, Yes, I had a customer with 2× MS-MICs in an MX104 in production. No major issues with this so far.
They use nor ams neither rsp, just old-good per source IP FBF with bit masks like this: from source address 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.1 then routing-instance CGN-1 /* 10.x.x.a, a is even */ from source address 10.0.0.1/255.0.0.1 then routing-instance CGN-2 /* 10.x.x.b, b is odd */ With manual pools partitioning and some additional route leaking tricks to make it redundant. A major concern for CGN is that you want all sessions from the same source IP to be nated to the same external address. Otherwise your support will die under tons of "why my passive mode FTP/PPTP/IPsec don't work?" This is why basic ECMP is normally not the best option. No idea how ASM deals with this, I think it should, but just be aware. Pavel 2017-09-13 19:44 GMT+02:00 Aaron Gould <aar...@gvtc.com>: > Has anyone tried this combing two MS-MIC-16G cards to accomplish higher > CGNAT throughput ? > > -Aaron > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp