Hi Pshem, Yes, you can. Just as I described in my previous post.
Regards, Wojciech 22.12.2017 00:43 "Pshem Kowalczyk" <pshe...@gmail.com> napisaĆ(a): Hi, Can we use this for non-BNG functions as well? Despite a large number all of those VLANs are 'static' customers. kind regards Pshem On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 at 23:01 <adamv0...@netconsultings.com> wrote: > Hi Pshem, > > The feature designed specifically for what you are looking for is > pseudowire > headend (or pseudowire headed termination PWHT on junos). I'm just really > surprised no one mentioned it already. > The limit is 2048 in 15.1 and should be raised to around 15k on 17.1. > But as always you should do a fair amount of scaling and performance > testing > to see if it's suitable for your product scale and BW requirements. > > I feel your pain when I was designing Carrier Ethernet solution several > years ago when there was no PWHE available had to use two routers at the > head-end one to terminate PW into qinq and other with L3 to VRF. > The only other option was bridge-domain per PW which obviously does not > scale (well not at scales I needed anyways). > > adam > > netconsultings.com > ::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry:: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf > > Of Pshem Kowalczyk > > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 10:07 PM > > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: [j-nsp] Stiching L2 to L3 on MX480 > > > > Hi, > > > > We have an existing setup consisting of a number of ACX5k and MX480 > > (single MPLS domain). We generally provide L2 services out of the ACXes > and > > L3 out of the MXes. Now, a new requirement emerged to provide L3 (with > > features that ACX can't provide) in locations where we can't justify the > MX. > > I'd like to know if it's possible to do the following (and if anything > special is > > required on the MX) 1. Build a L2 PWE3 taking whole port on the ACX and > > logically terminate it on the MX 2. The logical port on the MX (I presume > 'lt') > > will be used to terminate individual dot1q and QinQ services into L3 > VPNs. > > > > Looking at the documentation it appears to be possible, but I'd like to > know > > what sort of limitations this solution might have, particularly when it > comes to > > QoS on the MX. > > > > kind regards > > Pshem > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp