Hey, >From BOM POV if you have to pay for the XEONs it probably isn't very good value proposal per Mpps. However if you have poor pricing for MX, good pricing on your XEON and modest pps need, maybe it makes sense.
I've seen JNPR sell MX80 under 4k (back when they were newish, before MX104 existed), which is still good money for PQ3 and Trio in BOM perspective, but not very good consider how low volume JNPR is, and how R&D expensive it is to do Trio and PEchip. I wish JNPR would split into three companies, JNPR SW, JNPR HW, JNPR Integrator, so that they'd increase their volumes. I fear that at shrinking market cap they may become attractive acquisition target for company wanting to have established customer relations in US, company who otherwise struggles culturally to sell in US. On 21 April 2018 at 02:45, <mike+j...@willitsonline.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Since it was mentioned, I have been wondering the cost of going with > the software solution vMX as opposed to real hardware. Seems like it > should be a lot better right? > > > Mike- > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
