Thanks Maybe it's some version related thing for this platform... I will try it in our lab.
Tnx, Arie On Wed, May 2, 2018, 01:35 James Bensley <jwbens...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Arie, > > On 1 May 2018 at 23:21, Arie Vayner <ar...@vayner.net> wrote: > > user@MX104> show route table mpls.0 > > 16 *[VPN/0] 00:25:28 > > to table vpn_public_vrf.inet.0, Pop > > > > > > While if we do the same on our MX240 it looks like this: > > 18 *[VPN/0] 4d 21:24:17 > > > via *lsi.2048* (vpn_public_vrf), Pop > > Just checked a lab MX104, it shows the same output as your MX240 > output (it's running 16.1R6.7). > > Routing instance type vrf && vrf-table-label yeah? > > Cheers, > James. > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
