On 6/27/18 8:42 AM, Tom Beecher wrote: > Can confirm convergence time on the MX80 with even a single full table > session is extremely painful, and essentially not functional in a > production environment. > > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Dovid Bender <do...@telecurve.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> In my 9-5 I work for an ITSP where we have two MX5's with >> - iBGP >> - two up steams with two BGP sessions each (one per routes) >> - one upstream with one bgp session >> - one bgp session where we get minimal routes (maybe 15 total) >> >> I was told that convergence time on the MX5 would be horrible so we never >> tried full routes. I am wondering what's the "lowest" model that can >> support full routes without having an issue re-sorting the routes. the 32 bit freescale control-plane cpu is bit under-powered.
virtual-mx / mx150 as software devices are more than capable of doing it. So are devices like the mx204, MX REs newer than the RE-2000 (which is a bit long in the tooth / more than 10 years old a this point) also mid-range and higher SRXes >> >> TIA. >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp