In my view, the benefits of keeping them separate far outweigh the additional effort of creating and managing the additional groups.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Rob Foehl <r...@loonybin.net> wrote: > Wondering aloud a bit... I've seen plenty of cases where wedging parallel > v4/v6 sessions into the same BGP group and letting the router sort out > which AFI it's supposed to be using on each session works fine, and nearly > as many where configuring anything family-specific starts to get ugly > without splitting them into separate v4/v6 groups. Are there any > particularly compelling reasons to prefer one over the other? > > I can think of a bunch of reasons for and against on both sides, and > several ways to handle it with apply-groups or commit scripts. Curious > what others are doing here. > > Thanks! > > -Rob > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
