Hey, Other posters are correct... IPv6 routes are not requied, it forwards based on received label as next hop is already known. Confused myself as I was distributing full IPv6 table in my lab testing and assumed it was working because of that, but it's not the case.
Cheers, Dan On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 at 20:23, Andrey Kostin <ank...@podolsk.ru> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for answering. All routers have family inet6 configured on all > participating interfaces, because other v6 traffic is forwarded without > MPLS, so we are safe for that. > > > Kind regards, > Andrey > > Dan Peachey писал 20.07.2018 16:40: > > >> > > Hi, > > > > Presumably the penultimate LSR has the IPv6 iBGP routes? i.e. it > > knows how > > to IPv6 route to the destination. The last LSR->LER hop should just > > be IPv6 > > routed in that case. > > > > I've noticed this behaviour before whilst playing with 6PE on lab > > devices. > > It would of course break if you were running IPv4 core only. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dan > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
