Strange we had no issues upgrading from 17.3R2 from 15.1X. On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Gustavo Santos <gustkil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes... Exactly. > > I upgraded to 17.3R2 and was a total mess. And had to downgrade to 15.1X > train. > > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:31 AM Colton Conor <colton.co...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Gustavo, >> >> We you say " Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC >> recommended that made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to find >> the physical ports..) We had to downgrade to get it back working again.." >> what version was this as JTAC recently changed their recommended version? >> It seem everyone on this thread is talking about software train 15.1X54. >> >> However, the current JTAC recommended version is Junos 17.3R2 as of 14 >> May 2018. Why is everyone running 15.1X54 code? >> >> Has anyone upgraded to Junos 17.3R2 on the ACX's? No matter the model, >> all ACX's current recommended is now Junos 17.3R2 >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Gustavo Santos <gustkil...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I had some issues with ACX5048 , the most noticable was arp packets from >>> pure L2 vlans and VPLS punting to CPU and flooding the default arp policer >>> police.. >>> JTAC was able to reproduce the issue and gave us an option to disable >>> default arp policer until they release a service release to fix this issue >>> that was solved indeed. >>> >>> Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC recommended that >>> made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to find the physical >>> ports..) We had to downgrade to get it back working again.. >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 8:05 PM Alexandre Guimaraes < >>> alexandre.guimar...@ascenty.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Better in terms of concept. In term of usage, i still investing in >>>> qfx5100 >>>> >>>> Acx5058 Suppose to be a promise of a new future, unfortunately, with >>>> all problematic of the qfx5100 hardware, the acx5048 leak vlan till the >>>> last breath of cpu.... after that, all deamons and services going down.... >>>> up and down, up and down. >>>> >>>> I never more brought one peace ACX5048 after jtac didnt responds why >>>> and solution for the leaking...( I have only two acx5048 and hundreds on >>>> QFX...). >>>> >>>> The new promise is the new acx5448. No vlan leaking, a good load >>>> balance(ae) algorithm, full of this.... full of that.... a lot of promise. >>>> >>>> Let’s see... >>>> >>>> att >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> Em 1 de jul de 2018, à(s) 19:31, Colton Conor <colton.co...@gmail.com> >>>> escreveu: >>>> >>>> > What is the main difference between these two boxes? Hardware wise >>>> they >>>> > look identical. Is there anything on the hardware side that makes the >>>> > ACX5048 better than a QFX5100, or is it only software related? >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >>>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp