> From: Ivan Ivanov [mailto:ivanov.i...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 10:58 AM > > Hi, > > There are a few different ways to resolve the MP-BGP routes on out of band > Juniper RR. Depends on how flexible you want to be, one can use static route > in inet.3, change of the resolution or rib-groups copying the routes form > inet.0 to inet.3. > > Using the static route will work even without family mpls enabled on the > interfaces. However the other two ways require that family to be enabled on > the RR interfaces. > Hmm that’s interesting, cause on code version 12 and 15 the “set routing-options resolution rib bgp.l3vpn.0 resolution-ribs inet.0” is the only thing that’s needed, i.e. no need for family mpls on RR interfaces. So I have a theory that once you enable inet.3 (in any shape or form) then you need "family mpls" on RR interfaces?
adam netconsultings.com ::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry:: _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
