Re: [j-nsp] Use cases for IntServ in MPLS backbones

[Mark Tinka]

On 2/Oct/18 12:37, Saku Ytti wrote:

> I'm not proposing any global agreement on DSCP, I'm proposing passing
> them as-is so when there is same instance in ingress and egress, they
> can do with them what they want.

So when my customer says to me... "I sent DSCP=46 to Yahoo, but I think
my Yahoo is still not faster?", what do I tell them?

Or, when customer says to me... "I sent DSCP=3 from my office in Nairobi
to my office in Perth, but the Perth side is seeing DSCP=12", what do I
tell them?

In both cases, I do not have full end-to-end for the life of the packet.

Mark.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp