On 17/Jan/19 20:08, Saku Ytti wrote: > And you have shorter paths with inferior bandwidth which you do not > want to use, you'll rather take 9x10GE links than 1xGE to reach the > destination? It boggles my mind which network has _common case_ where > bandwidth is most indicative of best SPT. In some economies, shorter paths can be more expensive than longer ones. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
- [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Event Script
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Thomas Bellman
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T James Bensley
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth ... Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwi... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwi... James Bensley
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Pavel Lunin
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Thomas Bellman
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] OSPF reference-bandwidth 1T James Bensley