On 21/Jan/20 21:58, Luis Balbinot wrote: > The 5448 and the 5048 are quite different. I have several 5048 in my > plant and when we questioned Juniper about a replacement with 100G > interfaces their engineers compared the config template from our 5048s > and said the 5448 wasn't capable of doing some of the RSVP and RPM > stuff we were doing on the 5048. This was about 6 months ago. We are not an RSVP house, but these are things I'd like to know. Thanks for the feedback. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Thomas Scott
- [j-nsp] Automation - The Skinny (W... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] Automation - The Skinn... Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] Automation - The Skinn... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Gert Doering
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Shamen Snyder
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Colton Conor
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 quinn snyder
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 Colton Conor