Thanks all for this information. Aaron I had my client run this same command on their QFX5100, and it too has max 3 labels. It seems the issue is that the client needs a layer 2 transport over a layer 3 network. VPLS is the logical choice, and the ACX5048 supports this according to the Juniper Feature Explorer. The QFX5100, however, does not. What layer 2 over Layer 3 option do you recommend for the QFX5100 to talk to an ACX5048 or MX204 on the other end? It looks like the QFX5100 supports Ethernet-over-MPLS (L2 circuit). Is this an alternative to VPLS? ACX and MX does not support Ethernet-over-MPLS (L2 circuit) however. It seems there is no common protocol that both the QFX and ACX/MX share in common under the Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) section of the feature explorer. Is there any solution other than replacing the QFX with ACX's or MX's?
https://apps.juniper.net/feature-explorer/select-platform.html?category=Switching&typ=1#family=&pid=31705100&platform=QFX5100&rel=20.4R1&sid=1093&stat=0.10700692867685069&swName=Junos%20OS On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:51 AM <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > Of the interfaces configured for mpls on this acx, they show max labels 3 > > > > me@5048> show mpls interface detail | grep "Interface|labels" > Interface: ae0.0 > Maximum labels: 3 > Interface: ae40.0 > Maximum labels: 3 > Interface: xe-0/0/0.0 > Maximum labels: 3 > Interface: ge-0/0/3.0 > Maximum labels: 3 > Interface: ge-0/0/5.0 > Maximum labels: 3 > Interface: ge-0/0/13.0 > Maximum labels: 3 > Interface: ge-0/0/18.0 > Maximum labels: 3 > Interface: ge-0/0/24.0 > Maximum labels: 3 > Interface: ge-0/0/38.0 > Maximum labels: 3 > > me@5048> show system information > Model: acx5048 > Family: junos > Junos: 17.4R2-S11 > Hostname: 5048 > > > > -Aaron > > > > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
