Sorry for the delay. Thanks Alex, Tom and Martin. If I understand correctly, the summary is:
- MX204 does not support SNAT on interface (could have been the elegant configuration) - MX204 does not support PAT at all - SNAT is doable with routing instances - PAT is doable by offloading the work to a Linux box - SNAT + PAT is not doable elegantly on a sole MX204 box And thanks Martin for the time you put in writing your thorough and detailed example. Have a nice day, -- Emmanuel Halbwachs, Observatoire de Paris, ✆ +33 1 45 07 75 54 DIO¹ / CASTORS² 🦫 / PANDA³ 🐼 ¹ Direction Informatique de l'Observatoire ; ² CAlcul, STOckage, Réseau, Système ³ Pool of Awesome Network Devices Administrators
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
