On 28 February 2018 at 13:42, Brian Granger <[email protected]> wrote:

> Matthias, helpful thoughts! I think your example points to a third
> question a user might be trying to answer:
>
> 3) "How are the last modified times of these notebooks differ?"
>
> I fully agree that seeing a set of notebooks with a time of "X Y ago"
> is not helpful tin answering that question. However, I don't think the
> usability issues are unique to "long times" ago. For example, it would
> be just as painful to see a few notebooks that say "5 minutes ago" as
> "5 month ago" if I am trying to answer this third question.
>

Yes, except ISO 8601 does not "loose granularity" when time passes. I'm
going to assume that if we format to iso, we'll add HH:MM but not SS,
so having 5 notebooks "at 14:16" or 5 notebooks "5 minutes ago" is the
same. You can't differentiate regardless  of moment.js vs iso.
If the 5 notebooks are from 5 different days in Jan, with ISO I can still
distinguish, with moment I can't.

So I believe issues are exacerbated with old files.

in other words, the issue with moment.js "Smart" format is that 2 notebooks
differentiable today, will not be tomorrow. The buckets get larger too
fast.
I like Thomas' example of Gnome, which does (seem to) strike a nice balance.
-- 
M

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Project Jupyter" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jupyter/CANJQusVbXHaQX7xozAeBfxQAkPDrjEZxiFKqGgrWOK1FCtMsiw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to