Adam Bouhenguel wrote: > Why not only allow class unloading only for classes without static > fields, static methods, or static initializers? That side-steps the > initialization issues and means that you need an instance in order to > use it (no static elements + no references = no problem unloading). Am > I correct in my line of thinking?
Seems perfectly reasonable to me :) And as far as I know, there's no negative side to this. - Charlie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
