Jochen Theodorou wrote: > I think there is not enough data to see a trend. I modified your test, > made it run from 1-20 threads and for 50 loops, making an average time > containing the time it took to execute all threads and put these in a > diagram. I used a Q6600 Quadcore intel CPU with java 1.6.0_03-b05 on > Linux 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux. What I can see is that > the time constantly goes up until 4 Threads are reached, my number of > CPUs. Using 5 threads is takes less time than using 4, but after that > the time looks more or less constant. > > This looks quite scalable to me.
You did notice the code splits the number of iterations by the number of threads, right? At the very least, the amount of time taken to run all threads should go down. Run the same test in Java 5 and you'll see that Java 6 does not scale properly at all for this test. - Charlie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
