On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's room for all :) I don't think I'll have trouble fitting in some > information about almost every language we've discussed on this > list...so gimme whatever you want. Here are some lesser-known languages from Tolksdorf's list at http://www.robert-tolksdorf.de/vmlanguages.html that I think are pretty interesting -- I've at least read the docs and played around with them a bit: CAL: a lazy functional programming language close to Haskell Aardappel: general tree rewriting language (like Q) using a purely graphical syntax TRS-80 Model I Basic: just what it sounds like Bistro: a variant of Smalltalk that compiles to bytecodes dSelf: Self, and with distributed execution too. (Some docs are only in German, but still fairly readable.) PERCobol: Cobol, no kidding. (Not open source) NetREXX: Mike Cowlishaw's classic REXX language adapted to the JVM. Also, don't forget Rhino. -- GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
